Law
×

Evidence Act-Section-167

167. No new trial for improper admission or rejection of evidence.-
The improper admission or rejection of evidence shall not be ground of itself for a new trial or reversal of any decision in any case, if it shall appear to the Court before which such objection is raised that, independently of the evidence objected to and admitted, there was sufficient evidence to justify the decision, or that, if the rejected evidence had been received, it ought not to have varied the decision.

Kolkata High Court: Kabir Sk vs The State Of West Bengal on 21 February, 2014
Section 167 of the Evidence Act applies where inadmissible evidence has been admitted or where evidence which according to rules contained in the Act should have been rejected, has been improperly admitted. Such improper reception or rejection of evidence shall not of itself be a ground for new trial or reversal of any decision in any case, unless in the opinion of the Court before which such objection is raised, substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has been thereby occasioned. If the Court considers that after leaving aside the evidence that has been improperly admitted, there is enough evidence on record to justify the decision of lower court, no court of appeal should set it aside. If it is found that the remaining evidence are sufficient to justify the decision, then Court should not arrive at for reversal of decision.